🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.