🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."